Which of the following is NOT a consequence of passing Motion 3?

The reason that implementing rigid future commitment is not a consequence of passing Motion 3 is that Motion 3 typically aims to maintain flexibility in operations and decision-making. Such motions are often designed to adapt to changing circumstances rather than lock in strict, unchangeable requirements. In contexts like the World Service Conference, there is usually a preference for policies that allow for adaptability and responsiveness to the needs of the organization and its members.

On the other hand, the other options represent direct outcomes that align more closely with motions focused on structural changes and governance. For example, replacing the temporary suspension of the rotation policy and establishing a permanent policy both indicate a move toward a more standardized approach. Similarly, mandating board approval for future conventions suggests a shift towards centralized decision-making that could impose more rigid structures.